Zack has argued 12 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, briefed many other Supreme Court cases, filed more than 100 briefs at the certiorari stage, and presented argument before numerous other federal and state appellate courts. He joined Weil from the U.S. Department of Justice, where he served for five years as an Assistant to the U.S. Solicitor General. In that role, he represented the United States in litigation in the Supreme Court, and assisted in coordinating the government’s appellate strategy in lower courts nationwide. Zack previously served as Special Counsel to the General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Defense and Attorney Adviser at the U.S. Department of State.
Notable engagements include:
- Secured a unanimous win in the Supreme Court in Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, which held that the fraud exception to discharge under the Bankruptcy Code applies to a debtor’s liability for the actual fraud of a business partner, when the debtor did not personally perpetrate the fraud but is vicariously liable for it under state law.
- Representing a tech company in several appeals regarding the scope and interpretation of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
- Representing Zion Williamson in a dispute between the 2019 NBA #1 draft pick and his former agent, who has asserted claims of more than $100M in damages. Zack helped Williamson obtain a complete win at the trial level, with a federal district court holding that the contract between Williamson and his former agent was illegal and void under the Uniform Athlete Agents Act.
- Representing Ethicon, a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, in an important Federal Circuit appeal regarding the scope and validity of a series of patents on surgical staplers.
- Representing the U.S. Chamber of Commerce as amicus curiae in a series of cases in the U.S. Supreme Court, including BP v. Baltimore, Morgan v. Sundance, and Badegerow v. Walters.
- Represented Ross Stores in a significant victory in the Fifth Circuit in a real estate dispute involving a seller’s refusal to comply with its contractual obligations to provide easements necessary for Ross to construct and open a distribution center in Texas.
- Represented Bridgestone in a significant victory in the Sixth Circuit regarding the scope and preclusive effect of a prior settlement with a nationwide class action of indirect purchasers.
- Represented Westinghouse Electric Company in a successful certified interlocutory appeal before the Third Circuit that addressed whether a bankruptcy court can discharge and bar administrative claims that arose after confirmation of a plan, but before the plan became effective.
- Represented Epiq Systems in a successful appeal in the New York courts, with the Appellate Division holding that a contractual limitation-of-liability provision applied to a case involving Epiq’s sale of its Chapter 7 software business to Axos Bank, sharply limiting Epiq’s maximum exposure.
- Represented Upsolve, Inc. in the Southern District of New York in obtaining a landmark win in a First Amendment challenge to protect Upsolve’s mission to train non-lawyers to provide limited legal advice to low-income New Yorkers who face debt collection actions.
- Representing several Rastafarian former inmates in appeals seeking to obtain money damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, when prison officials violated their religious rights by forcibly cutting their dreadlocks.
- Before joining Weil, Zack argued and won important Supreme Court cases on subjects including bankruptcy law (Mission Product Holdings v. Tempnology), patent law (Life Technologies Corp. v. Promega Corp. and WesternGeco v. ION Geophysical Corp.), insurance (Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. Nevils), and administrative exhaustion (Ross v. Blake).
Zack is recognized by Chambers USA as a leading lawyer nationally for Appellate Law, with commentators touting his strength in bringing “people together in difficult situations…and building consensus,” and calling him “a great writer, quick and very effective at the podium.” He also is nationally recommended by Legal 500 for both Appellate: Courts of Appeal and Appellate: Supreme Courts, where clients note that he is “phenomenal,” “extremely quick-thinking,” and “knows the U.S. Supreme Court especially well.”
Zack received his B.A., cum laude, from Yale University and his J.D. from Columbia Law School, where he was a James Kent scholar and served as an Articles Editor of the Columbia Law Review. After graduating, Zack clerked for Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Awards and Recognition, Speaking Engagements, Firm News & Announcements, Latest Thinking
Awards and Recognition
- Zack Tripp Named a Leading Lawyer Nationally for Appellate Law: Nationwide Award Brief — Chambers USA
- Zack Tripp Named a “Recommended” Lawyer Nationally for Appellate: Courts of Appeal Award Brief — Legal 500 US
Briefing and Arguing Technical Bankruptcy Appeals Before the Supreme Court and Circuit Courts
October 18-22, 2022 — Orlando, FL — Zack Tripp, Weil’s Complex Commercial Litigation partner and Co-Head of its Appeals and Strategic Counseling practice, was a panelist at the National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges’ 96th Annual Conference, where he discussed his experience and insights regarding how bankruptcy appeals can successfully be briefed and argued to the generalist Supreme Court and Circuit Courts of appeal.
Firm News & Announcements
- Weil Secures 9-0 Victory in the U.S. Supreme Court in Bartenwerfer v. Buckley Litigation Win — February 22, 2023
- Weil Seeks Money Damages for Prisoners Whose Religious Freedoms Have Been Violated Firm Announcement — October 28, 2022
- Litigation Trends 2023 Publication — By Weil’s Litigation Department — Spring 2023
- Supreme Court Resolves Split on U.S. Trustee Fees Blog Post — Weil Restructuring — By Garrett Fail, Candace M. Arthur, Zack Tripp and Alex Paul Cohen — June 07, 2022
- Professor Justice Ginsburg: Justice Ginsburg’s Love of Procedure and Jurisdiction Publication — Columbia Law Review — By Zack Tripp and Gillian E. Metzger — April 2021
- Supreme Court Holds That “But-For” Causation Is Not Required For Specific Jurisdiction Publication — By Zack Tripp, Pravin R. Patel, Brian Liegel and Elaina Aquila — April 08, 2021
- Supreme Court Holds That “But-For” Causation Is Not Required For Specific Jurisdiction Alert — Class Action Monitor — By Zack Tripp, Pravin R. Patel, Brian Liegel and Elaina Aquila — PDF — March 26, 2021