Richard W. Slack
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Richard W. Slack specializes in complex business litigation, including representing clients in securities, financial products, fiduciary duty, and corporate governance matters. During his 25 years at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, he has developed a hard-nosed approach to representing clients in aggressive and protracted “bet the company” litigation in both state and federal courts. Mr. Slack also has expertise in counseling and litigating matters related to “busted corporate transactions,” where one party attempts to terminate an agreement or transaction based on “material adverse change,” lack of “best efforts,” or similar clauses in contracts. He has counseled or litigated these matters on behalf of such clients as HM Capital Partners, Providence Equity, Boston Properties, and General Electric

Over the past few years, Mr. Slack has also acted as counsel on significant litigation arising out of bankruptcy proceedings raising fiduciary duty and corporate governance issues, including representing Lehman in its bankruptcy in connection with its portfolio of more than 1 million derivative transactions with approximately 6,500 counterparties; General Electric Capital Corporation in a three-year litigation arising out of the Montgomery Ward bankruptcy; and representing a litigation trust seeking to recover damages on behalf of bondholders arising out the bankruptcy of At Home Corporation.

Mr. Slack graduated with honors from the University of Michigan. He received a JD degree from Washington University, where he served on the Washington University Law Quarterly.

  • Education
    University of Michigan (B.A., with honors, 1983); Washington Univ Law (J.D., 1986)
  • New York
  • +1 212 310 8017 tel
  • +1 212 310 8007 fax

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

This website is maintained by Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP in New York, NY.
Copyright © 2012 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, All Rights Reserved. The contents of this website may contain
attorney advertising under the laws of various states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.